top of page
Search

Rhetorical Strategies and Logical Fallacies

Updated: Jun 24, 2020

"The general election ads from the 2016 presidential campaign represented a referendum on each candidate’s character. And in this ad race, there were no winners.

Both the Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump campaigns featured the takeaway message that their opponent is not fit to lead. Even though Trump won the election, he will face significant obstacles in reestablishing the credibility he needs to lead a very divided electorate. Fear and anger were the key emotions of TV ads from both campaigns and two Super PACS. Trump must now find a way to mitigate national anxieties in the wake of a polarizing election." (UMD PARC Research Team, The Conversation)


"Our team coded the content of each ad using four tenets: 1) whether content was positive, negative or comparative, 2) whether ads focused on issues, character or a combination of character and issue, 3) the emotional appeals used based on six primary emotions: anger, fear, sadness, joy, love and surprise, and 4) the subject matter. Together, these tenets helped reveal the broader strategy of each campaign – a strategy that focused more on the weaknesses of the opponent rather than the strengths of the candidate." (UMD PARC Research Team, The Conversation)


"In another ad, titled “America’s Bully,” Clinton tells a young girl, “We shouldn’t let anybody bully his way into the presidency.” The ads addressed Trump’s temperament and intelligence, contrasting him with Clinton’s moral character, government experience and steady nature. In attacking Trump, the ads primarily appealed to emotions of fear, sadness and anger." (UMD PARC Research Team, The Conversation)


"Overall, Trump’s campaign strategy focused on building a more positive image of himself while denigrating Clinton’s character. For instance, in his ad “Deplorable,” the narrator queried: “You know what’s deplorable?” The answer: “Hillary Clinton viciously demonizing hard-working people like you.” The incendiary language that Clinton used (“deplorable”) and Trump applied to Clinton (“demonizing”) exacerbated the anger and fear animating the campaign ads of 2016." (UMD PARC Research Team, The Conversation)




 
 
 

1 Comment


smcho1007
Jun 26, 2020

Rhetorical strategies are used to convince people, so presidential candidates and their campaign teams should not be vilified for including them in their campaign ads. Real issues are difficult to address within the timeframe of a campaign ad. If candidates are confident in their solid plan to lead the nation, it shouldn’t matter what logical fallacies they make in defense of them.

Like
Post: Blog2_Post

©2020 by Political Advertising by Simon C.. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page