top of page

HOW DO ADVERTISEMENTS AFFECT THE NARRATIVE OF POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS IN THE UNITED STATES?

Political campaign advertisements in the United States have become their own kind of tool for communication and experts Lynda Lee Kaid and Christina Holtz Batcha write extensively on this topic. Their research states that “The history of political advertising can be traced to early uses of posters, handbills, and printed materials used in the earliest elections in the United States, but it was the development of electronic media that made advertising so central to U.S. campaigns… television has occupied the preeminent role in the U.S. political advertising since the 1950’s” (Kaid & Batcha pg. 37). Televised and video style campaign ads have become even more prominent with the expanse of the internet and social media platforms. Presidential campaign advertisements are seen almost everywhere and affect the narrative of how candidates are presented to the public. 


Most campaigns choose to spend most of their money on campaign ads which shows how important they are to campaign success. Millions of dollars are spent to make the candidates seem worthy of precious votes. Each party has its own techniques and strategies to entice targeted voters. As a result of trying to control images and outcomes, rhetorical strategies and logical fallacies are present elements in these ads - these rhetorical strategies and logical fallacies used say a lot about how American citizens elect their government officials.


By looking at campaign advertisements using the lens of money, rhetoric, and specific party strategies, we can see how misguided our political system has become. This is important because voters are, now more than ever, aware of how superficial and insubstantial campaign advertisements are. Should something else be done with the millions of dollars spent? Are campaign ads somehow insulting the intelligence of the American public? Has our government become so divided that it has become inefficient?

Read More
Home: Welcome
Home: Blog2
Search

RECOMMENDED READINGS

GOLDSTEIN, KENNETH, AND TRAVIS N. RIDOUT. “MEASURING THE EFFECTS OF TELEVISED POLITICAL ADVERTISING IN THE UNITED STATES.” ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, VOL. 7, NO. 1, 17 MAY 2004, PP. 205–226, 10.1146/ANNUREV.POLISCI.7.012003.104820. ACCESSED 27 JULY 2019.

 

HUNTER, LAUREN, ET AL. “2016 PRESIDENTIAL ADVERTISING FOCUSED ON CHARACTER ATTACKS.” THE CONVERSATION, 17 NOV. 2016, THECONVERSATION.COM/2016-PRESIDENTIAL-ADVERTISING-FOCUSED-ON-CHARACTER-ATTACKS-68642.

 

JOHNSON-CARTEE, KAREN S., AND GARY COPELAND. NEGATIVE POLITICAL ADVERTISING: COMING OF AGE. GOOGLE BOOKS, ROUTLEDGE, 16 DEC. 2013, BOOKS.GOOGLE.COM/BOOKS?HL=EN&LR=&ID=MR9EAGAAQBAJ&OI=FND&PG=PP1&DQ=POLITICAL+ADVERTISING+TECHNIQUES+IN+THE+UNITED+STATES&OTS=ENJAA2CWUW&SIG=AC2Q2K7LBJ1MHIPE8U1XPQH3XYU#V=ONEPAGE&Q=POLITICAL%20ADVERTISING%20TECHNIQUES%20IN%20THE%20UNITED%20STATES&F=FALSE. ACCESSED 24 JUNE 2020.

KAID, LYNDA LEE, AND CHRISTINA HOLTZ-BACHA. THE SAGE HANDBOOK OF POLITICAL ADVERTISING. GOOGLE BOOKS, SAGE PUBLICATIONS, 14 JUNE 2006, BOOKS.GOOGLE.COM/BOOKS?HL=EN&LR=&ID=EBN1AWAAQBAJ&OI=FND&PG=PP1&DQ=THE+SAGE+HANDBOOK+OF+POLITICAL+ADVERTISING&OTS=GJD_6FZXNG&SIG=EKXLDJASFL6TR_YQIJDFPZDBCSU#V=ONEPAGE&Q=THE%20SAGE%20HANDBOOK%20OF%20POLITICAL%20ADVERTISING&F=FALSE. ACCESSED 24 JUNE 2020.

STAMPLER, LAURA. “OBAMA SPENT MORE ON ONLINE ADS THAN IT COST TO BUILD THE LINCOLN MEMORIAL.” BUSINESS INSIDER, 5 NOV. 2012, WWW.BUSINESSINSIDER.COM/INFOGRAPHIC-OBAMA-ROMNEY-FINAL-AD-SPEND-2012-11. ACCESSED 24 JUNE 2020.

 

UNIVERSITY, STANFORD. “STANFORD EXPERTS DISCUSS THE DEEP POLITICAL DIVIDE IN THE U.S.” STANFORD NEWS, 9 NOV. 2016, NEWS.STANFORD.EDU/2016/11/09/STANFORD-EXPERTS-DISCUSS-DEEP-POLITICAL-DIVIDE-U-S/. ACCESSED 24 JUNE 2020.

Home: List

©2020 by Political Advertising by Simon C.. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page